Call for your free consultation (02) 9025 9888

Traffic Law » Drink Driving » The Drink Driving Guideline Judgment

Streeton Lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of traffic law.

The Drink Driving Guideline Judgment

To act as a guide to lower courts when sentencing offenders charged with high-range PCA, the NSW Supreme Court set out a Guideline Judgment.

Although the Guideline Judgment is in relation to offenders found guilty of high-range PCA, courts often refer to the principles and comments made by the judges in the Guideline Judgment when sentencing offenders charged with low range or mid-range PCA.

Why Streeton Lawyers?

  • Proven track record of exceptional results
  • Accredited specialists in Criminal Law available
  • Rated a First Tier Criminal Law Firm in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 by Doyle’s Legal Guide
  • Your first consultation is free

Call 24/7 (02) 9025 9888

    Free enquiry

    Aggravating Factors

    In the Guideline Judgment, the Supreme Court said that the following factors aggravate the seriousness of the offence:

    • The degree of intoxication
    • Erratic or aggressive driving
    • Competitive driving or showing off
    • Length of the journey at which others are exposed to risk
    • The number of persons put at risk by the driving (for example, passengers in the vehicle).

    The Supreme Court also made the following observations:

    • Prior good character: Of less relevance because persons of otherwise good character often commit these offences.
    • Nature of the driving: Once the vehicle is in motion the offence is more serious because of the risk of death or injury to others is increased.
    • Involvement in a driver education program: This will have little impact on the appropriate sentence to be imposed with high range PCA, except in relation to the length of disqualification or the amount of a fine. The Court said that offence is “so serious and the criminality…so high” that the participation in a program cannot be seen as an alternative to punishment. It will not warrant the making of a section 10 simply because the offender has participated in such a program.
    • The period of disqualification: The automatic period is not the maximum, but merely a default period that operates on conviction unless some other order is made. The disqualification period can be longer. There should be “sufficient and appropriate reasons for reducing the automatic period”.
    • Hardship: There will almost invariably be hardship, or at least inconvenience, caused by disqualification for such a lengthy period. The focus is upon a criminal offence that Parliament considers to be one of the most serious summary offences.
    • Orders under s.10: For high-range offences, the cases where, notwithstanding the objective seriousness of the offences, it is appropriate in all the circumstances to deal with a matter under section10 will be rare, and exceedingly rare for a second or subsequent offence. One example may be where a driver becomes compelled by an urgent and unforseen circumstance to drive a motor vehicle, say, to take a person to hospital.

    Importantly, the Supreme Court said an ordinary offender for the offence of high-range PCA is where:

    •  the offender drove to avoid personal inconvenience or because the offender did not believe that he or she was sufficiently affected by alcohol
    •  the offender was detected by a random breath test
    •  the offender has prior good character
    •  the offender has nil, or a minor, traffic record
    •  the offender’s licence was suspended on detection
    •  the offender pleaded guilty
    •  there is little or no risk of re-offending
    •  the offender would be significantly inconvenienced by loss of licence

    The Supreme Court then said that when sentencing an ordinary offender for high-range PCA:

    • an order under SECTION 10 will rarely be appropriate
    • a conviction cannot be avoided only because the offender has attended, or will attend, a driver’s education or awareness course
    •  the automatic disqualification period will be appropriate unless there is a good reason to reduce the period of disqualification
    • a good reason to reduce the automatic period of disqualification may include:
      • the nature of the offender’s employment
      • the absence of any viable alternative transport
      • sickness or infirmity of the offender or another person.
     Click here to return to the DRINK DRIVING PAGE.